9/31
  • Pages
  • Editions
01 Cover
02 AXA XL
03 Contents
04 Howden Tiger
05 Discipline and limit management become key as headwinds blow
06 Clarity of coverage key to cat, but rates must also rise: Ariel Re
07 Deutsche Ruck
08 Reinsurers still keen to grow casualty portfolios
09 Munich Re’s appetite is stable, but its book is changing
10 The drivers behind the new reinsurance normal
11 American AG
12 Market better positioned to listen to the client: AXA XL CEO
13 The growing importance of relationship transparency
14 Africa Specialty Risk is seeking new partners and capacity
15 Aon
16 2023 is fast becoming another big nat cat year
17 Hanover Re has warned on rates
18 Fidelity
19 CCR Re plans expansion after stake sale
20 Creating new risk retention norms
21 Reinsurance strategies in a hard market
22 Investors want sustainable profits before committing
23 Casualty environment remains highly uncertain and faces many challenges
24 AXA XL’s Twite eyes a smoother renewal
25 MGAs can be lucrative for reinsurers—if they have the tools
26 Perils forays into US cyber insurance market
27 Analogue actuarial practices are on borrowed time
28 Parametric insurance to become mainstream for travel insurers
29 10% of insurers face S&P review post new capital model
30 Cyber market has reached its most competitive point after pricing corrections
31 Contact Us

NEWS

Munich Re’s appetite is stable, but its book is changing

There will be no spectacular change in Munich Re’s appetite this renewal, but its book is changing.


Munich Re thinks the tumultuous renewal the market endured last year will not be repeated this year. While cedants may not always be happy with deals, and reinsurer gains from the past year will not be rolled back, primary insurer clients will at least approach this renewals cycle aware of Munich Re’s stance.

“There will be no spectacular change in our appetite this renewal,” Guido Funke, Munich Re’s chief for global clients and Lloyd’s, told Monte Carlo Today. “We had a clear appetite last 1/1, which itself hadn’t changed much from the past years.”

For Munich Re, that means being “prepared to grow” in nat cat and specialty wherever terms and conditions look right, while remaining “cautious” in casualty “simply because we see signs of softening” in some corners of the market that could merit some de-risking.

Now fundamental changes to structures have been completed, led by the massive hiking of attachment points, and with pricing looking adequate in property-cat, the reinsurer now believes underwriters come into their own again to examine the minutiae of what constitutes risk-adjusted pricing adequacy.

“Amid all the uncertainties and variables, it is very important to get underwriting done properly,” Funke said.

He notes that sharp increases in inflation tested underwriters. But the industry “is now doing not a bad job” on dealing with claims inflation, with constant caveat for the vagaries of inflation forecasting.

Extreme weather must also be reviewed in the quest for pricing adequacy, Funke insists. Yesteryear’s “work from the models” won’t cut it as “the industry now realises that with extreme weather, the trend only goes upwards”. Underwriters now need to be crunching the numbers on how to price that for next year, Funke said.

“It is very important to get underwriting done properly.”
Guido Funke, Munich Re

Daily decisions

The major structural work might be complete, but Munich Re’s shift out of proportional covers will continue.

But that too should be pretty clear to cedants. Munich Re shrunk its property and casualty proportional books to the benefit of non-proportional at all three 2023 major renewal dates, leaving overall volume growth a bit lumpy in the process. Amid the differing profiles of the books renewing at January, April and mid-year, Munich Re ended with volume gains of 1.9 percent, 11.1 percent and then a 1.9 percent contraction, respectively.

But it stresses that it is making such decisions on a case-by-case basis, on the economics of each deal. Munich Re has not, and will not, pursue a target portfolio mix of proportional to non-proportional.

In property, Munich Re “simply does not have such a big appetite for proportional”, Funke said. Proportional property is simply “not an easy one to sell” and Munich Re is not alone among reinsurers eschewing the line. “We were clearly not the only one or clients would have replaced us,” he said.

In casualty, where Munich Re’s proportional book is even more central, “we do have the appetite, but the conditions have to be right”, he said. “There are questions if the rate increases we see on the primary side make up for the loss development on the claims side.”



Main image: Shutterstock / Roman Chazov

CONTENTS