OPINION

A manmade property catastrophe

The blame should be attributed to the abuse of Florida’s legal system, says APCIA’s David Sampson.

Note: This interview was conducted prior to Hurricane Ian’s destructive landfall on Southwest Florida.

Florida homeowners are faced with soaring insurance rates and dwindling options for coverage. But the blame for this manmade catastrophe should be attributed to the abuse of Florida’s legal system, writes David Sampson, president & chief executive officer of the American Property Casualty Insurance Association.

This is the peak of the Atlantic hurricane season and activity has significantly increased in the last few weeks, which has put consumers and insurers on alert for storm activity. It raises awareness that it has been 30 years since Hurricane Andrew slammed into South Florida as a monstrous category 5 storm and brought near-total destruction to many communities.

This tragedy forever changed the way that American communities prepare for natural disasters. Hurricane Andrew ushered in stronger building codes and more investment in resilience—both of which have undoubtedly saved countless lives.

We are now seeing a new major catastrophe in Florida’s property insurance marketplace, except this one is manmade. The marketplace challenges are growing as the state has seen eight insurers go insolvent in the last two years. To avoid similar solvency risk, many companies have stopped writing new policies, leaving hundreds of thousands of policyholders seeking coverage with limited options in the marketplace.

To make matters worse, the average Florida homeowner’s insurance policy will soar to nearly $3,000 in 2022, roughly twice the US annual average.

The blame for this manmade catastrophe goes to the vast abuse of Florida’s legal system and rampant fraudulent roof replacement schemes. According to the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation, Florida accounted for 76 percent of the nation’s homeowners insurance lawsuits over claims filed while making up only 7 percent of the nation’s homeowners insurance claims.

Florida’s governor and legislature implemented positive reforms during a special session earlier this year that are a step in the right direction, but it will take time and additional reforms to stabilise Florida’s volatile property insurance market.

A widespread problem

The rapid decline of the property insurance market in Florida is not unique. Concerns about market strain and deterioration continue to grow in several states, particularly Louisiana and California, amid reports of diminishing availability and affordability of property insurance.

“Fraud related to property insurance claims is another issue.”
David Sampson, APCIA

Unchecked plaintiff bar tactics, anti-consumer litigation financing and more are driving up legal system costs and having a significant impact on the cost of insurance to American families. For example, nuclear verdicts—exceptionally high jury awards—have grown exponentially in the last few years.

The National Law Journal’s Top 100 Verdicts increased 350 percent from $64 million in 2015 to $225 million in 2020. And it is not just the number of record verdicts, as one analysis showed that there were 30 percent more cases during this time frame that pierced the $100 million threshold than there were in 2015. In the end, the cost of legal system abuse and nuclear verdicts burdens every American family.

Fraud related to property insurance claims is another issue that costs policyholders. According to data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the cost of non-health related insurance fraud is estimated to be more than $40 billion per year, which can translate to an additional $400 to $700 annually in insurance premiums for the average US family.

Insurers are also facing increasing challenges in managing risk due to government mandates and interference. Regulatory actions are exacerbating the effects of natural disasters by magnifying losses and prolonging market disruption. This is especially notable in California and Louisiana, where legislative environments have made it difficult and costly for insurance companies to operate and pay claims, and where regulatory environments restrict insurers’ ability to manage solvency risks through their overall exposure in high-risk areas.

To fix broken property insurance markets in states like Florida, California, and Louisiana, insurers urge state lawmakers and regulators to focus on addressing the underlying issues roiling markets and harming consumers, including implementing legal system reforms and anti-fraud measures, as well as promoting regulatory stability and disaster mitigation to help reduce future losses.

Insurers are an essential part of society as they provide the financial protection needed to help families, businesses, and communities recover and rebuild after a disaster. As natural disasters continue to increase in frequency and severity due to climate change, state leaders need to act on policies that will help create a healthy and sustainable insurance marketplace so that consumers can continue to protect the things that matter most to them. Because that’s what matters most to us.

David Sampson is president & CEO of the American Property Casualty Insurance Association. He can be contacted at: david.sampson@apci.org

Main image: Shutterstock / Holly Mazour